Thank you you have just elaborated everything that I have included in my own contemplation without reading your sources.... Renée Gerone fell for the Madonna trap ....
This is a highly reductionist view, lacking self reflection. Your criticism of paganism simply comes from the fact that your version of history has been presented to you by the hebrews who happened to have fought against these pagans. Your dogma is simply "everything I was told to dislike is demonic" and it takes away from the analysis where you actually offer meaningful explanations. Lacking discernment this way makes the reader know less than before after reading this, rather than more. Have you, for one second, considered the idea that you may have fallen for a psy-op, aimed at keeping your eyes closed to the true nature of then reality around you? Do you not think that simply calling everything demonic is a bit of sheepish view, implanted in you to better control you?
I would like to start with respectfully disagreeing with your comment. First and foremost, our criticisms of paganism do not come solely from "Hebrew sources", as Christians, evidenced by St. Augustine's City of God, as well as Muslims, via the Qur'an, have shown the spiritual dangers of gross paganism, as have the various societies that have practiced it that fell into deep deception and dysfunction that led to their downfall, including but not limited to: the Persians, Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, Hinduism (in its more recent degenerated forms), Vikings, and even the Aztecs (before the arrival of Christendom).
Beyond this, what you call our "version of history" comes from a macrocosmic spiritual history of mankind through various peoples and ages all operating in tandem with the downward tendency of manifestation, in conjunction with reprinting forces of Divine Order intervening to correct against infra-human forces borne from that which is adversarial, devilish, Luciferic, or Ahrimanic (see our article The Demonic Nature of Memes, the Internet and AI).
Just because the perspective that I've put forward does not align with the notions that you are not shy of vehemently guarding does not mean that I inherently "lack discernment", and, more than likely, this could be seen as an opportunity for you yourself to reflect and consider the fullness of the views expressed through this authorship.
With regards to what you reference as a "sheepish view", which is mean to "control", dependent upon shadowy "psy-ops", which no doubt extend from governmental initiatives, since an operation would imply a conspiratorial organization of individuals towards a common goal, I want you to really consider what you're forwarding here.
If there really was a set of forces bent upon deceiving me, or anyone else for that matter, that demons could be seen in many places and forms, what does this accomplish but make one more cautious, aware, and spiritually protected? Does it not seem evident that if there were indeed a shadowy cabal, bent on controlling one's behavior to lesser outcomes, keeping one's "eyes closed", wouldn't they rather say that there are no demons present and that there is no forces to fear?
Just because there are some subtle spirits that are not dangerous does not delimit the fact that, in the current state of cosmic manifestation, the forces of darkness are so well proliferated into all aspects of secular society that a call to recognition and action against such forces is in order. One is not controlled if one stands up in opposition against such forces on the side of Truth, for there is no greater freedom that one who works towards and achieves spiritual realization. One would be remiss to say that communication with subtle spirits is not harmful or even permissible because some are not bad, because it would be analogous to telling someone that playing with bears is okay because not all are wild and hungry.
One ought also begin to recognize that humans are not the only actors in global society, and that there are unseen forces that guide macrocosmic impulses of the anti-Traditional order, in levels that may surprise you. Perhaps the victim of the "psy-op" is not me, but you instead.
>First and foremost, our criticisms of paganism do not come solely from "Hebrew sources", as Christians, evidenced by St. Augustine's City of God, as well as Muslims, via the Qur'an, have shown the spiritual dangers of gross paganism, as have the various societies that have practiced it that fell into deep deception and dysfunction that led to their downfall, including but not limited to: the Persians, Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, Hinduism (in its more recent degenerated forms), Vikings, and even the Aztecs (before the arrival of Christendom).
Christianity and Islam might as well both be considered off-shoot psy-ops of either judadism or whatever force is behind judaism, which is if you're honest about the contents of the old testament, quite demonic itself. As you can see for yourself, all of these three societies are currently imploding, which one could argue is the work of that demon who decided to turn humanity against each other through Abrahamism itself. So as far as I'm concerned, do you not only not have a point but also contradict yourself by calling everything demonic except for the single most demonic being in recorded history that calls itself the creator of the cosmos which it clearly is not.
>Just because the perspective that I've put forward does not align with the notions that you are not shy of vehemently guarding does not mean that I inherently "lack discernment", and, more than likely, this could be seen as an opportunity for you yourself to reflect and consider the fullness of the views expressed through this authorship.
This is pure bullshit tactics and a waste of words.
>With regards to what you reference as a "sheepish view", which is mean to "control", dependent upon shadowy "psy-ops", which no doubt extend from governmental initiatives, since an operation would imply a conspiratorial organization of individuals towards a common goal, I want you to really consider what you're forwarding here.
Again a lot of words without saying anything.
>If there really was a set of forces bent upon deceiving me, or anyone else for that matter, that demons could be seen in many places and forms, what does this accomplish but make one more cautious, aware, and spiritually protected? Does it not seem evident that if there were indeed a shadowy cabal, bent on controlling one's behavior to lesser outcomes, keeping one's "eyes closed", wouldn't they rather say that there are no demons present and that there is no forces to fear?
No. They use your fear and hysteria against you and it seems to be working. They achieved to sever your ties with true source which is why I said you lack discernment. You have learned to not trust yourself which is in defiance of God with a capital G. Now that you defined the cosmos as fundamentally threatening you have been convinced to dismiss creation itself.
>One would be remiss to say that communication with subtle spirits is not harmful or even permissible because some are not bad, because it would be analogous to telling someone that playing with bears is okay because not all are wild and hungry.
Go on YouTube and watch some Russian dud play a with a bear. It's quite a wholesome experience.
Be humble, my friend. Come to know the light of Divine Wisdom. Your hatred of certain people and religious forms is but an illusion, not even borne from yourself. It is not man that is to be trusted, but God, for God is the source of man and is greater than man.
"He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered." Proverbs 28:26
I shall pray for you, for words will not convince you past your own pride. Peace and blessings be with you and yours, and may you find what you seek.
Thank you you have just elaborated everything that I have included in my own contemplation without reading your sources.... Renée Gerone fell for the Madonna trap ....
Let her gnome
Wear your hat
This is a highly reductionist view, lacking self reflection. Your criticism of paganism simply comes from the fact that your version of history has been presented to you by the hebrews who happened to have fought against these pagans. Your dogma is simply "everything I was told to dislike is demonic" and it takes away from the analysis where you actually offer meaningful explanations. Lacking discernment this way makes the reader know less than before after reading this, rather than more. Have you, for one second, considered the idea that you may have fallen for a psy-op, aimed at keeping your eyes closed to the true nature of then reality around you? Do you not think that simply calling everything demonic is a bit of sheepish view, implanted in you to better control you?
I would like to start with respectfully disagreeing with your comment. First and foremost, our criticisms of paganism do not come solely from "Hebrew sources", as Christians, evidenced by St. Augustine's City of God, as well as Muslims, via the Qur'an, have shown the spiritual dangers of gross paganism, as have the various societies that have practiced it that fell into deep deception and dysfunction that led to their downfall, including but not limited to: the Persians, Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, Hinduism (in its more recent degenerated forms), Vikings, and even the Aztecs (before the arrival of Christendom).
Beyond this, what you call our "version of history" comes from a macrocosmic spiritual history of mankind through various peoples and ages all operating in tandem with the downward tendency of manifestation, in conjunction with reprinting forces of Divine Order intervening to correct against infra-human forces borne from that which is adversarial, devilish, Luciferic, or Ahrimanic (see our article The Demonic Nature of Memes, the Internet and AI).
Just because the perspective that I've put forward does not align with the notions that you are not shy of vehemently guarding does not mean that I inherently "lack discernment", and, more than likely, this could be seen as an opportunity for you yourself to reflect and consider the fullness of the views expressed through this authorship.
With regards to what you reference as a "sheepish view", which is mean to "control", dependent upon shadowy "psy-ops", which no doubt extend from governmental initiatives, since an operation would imply a conspiratorial organization of individuals towards a common goal, I want you to really consider what you're forwarding here.
If there really was a set of forces bent upon deceiving me, or anyone else for that matter, that demons could be seen in many places and forms, what does this accomplish but make one more cautious, aware, and spiritually protected? Does it not seem evident that if there were indeed a shadowy cabal, bent on controlling one's behavior to lesser outcomes, keeping one's "eyes closed", wouldn't they rather say that there are no demons present and that there is no forces to fear?
Just because there are some subtle spirits that are not dangerous does not delimit the fact that, in the current state of cosmic manifestation, the forces of darkness are so well proliferated into all aspects of secular society that a call to recognition and action against such forces is in order. One is not controlled if one stands up in opposition against such forces on the side of Truth, for there is no greater freedom that one who works towards and achieves spiritual realization. One would be remiss to say that communication with subtle spirits is not harmful or even permissible because some are not bad, because it would be analogous to telling someone that playing with bears is okay because not all are wild and hungry.
One ought also begin to recognize that humans are not the only actors in global society, and that there are unseen forces that guide macrocosmic impulses of the anti-Traditional order, in levels that may surprise you. Perhaps the victim of the "psy-op" is not me, but you instead.
>First and foremost, our criticisms of paganism do not come solely from "Hebrew sources", as Christians, evidenced by St. Augustine's City of God, as well as Muslims, via the Qur'an, have shown the spiritual dangers of gross paganism, as have the various societies that have practiced it that fell into deep deception and dysfunction that led to their downfall, including but not limited to: the Persians, Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, Hinduism (in its more recent degenerated forms), Vikings, and even the Aztecs (before the arrival of Christendom).
Christianity and Islam might as well both be considered off-shoot psy-ops of either judadism or whatever force is behind judaism, which is if you're honest about the contents of the old testament, quite demonic itself. As you can see for yourself, all of these three societies are currently imploding, which one could argue is the work of that demon who decided to turn humanity against each other through Abrahamism itself. So as far as I'm concerned, do you not only not have a point but also contradict yourself by calling everything demonic except for the single most demonic being in recorded history that calls itself the creator of the cosmos which it clearly is not.
>Just because the perspective that I've put forward does not align with the notions that you are not shy of vehemently guarding does not mean that I inherently "lack discernment", and, more than likely, this could be seen as an opportunity for you yourself to reflect and consider the fullness of the views expressed through this authorship.
This is pure bullshit tactics and a waste of words.
>With regards to what you reference as a "sheepish view", which is mean to "control", dependent upon shadowy "psy-ops", which no doubt extend from governmental initiatives, since an operation would imply a conspiratorial organization of individuals towards a common goal, I want you to really consider what you're forwarding here.
Again a lot of words without saying anything.
>If there really was a set of forces bent upon deceiving me, or anyone else for that matter, that demons could be seen in many places and forms, what does this accomplish but make one more cautious, aware, and spiritually protected? Does it not seem evident that if there were indeed a shadowy cabal, bent on controlling one's behavior to lesser outcomes, keeping one's "eyes closed", wouldn't they rather say that there are no demons present and that there is no forces to fear?
No. They use your fear and hysteria against you and it seems to be working. They achieved to sever your ties with true source which is why I said you lack discernment. You have learned to not trust yourself which is in defiance of God with a capital G. Now that you defined the cosmos as fundamentally threatening you have been convinced to dismiss creation itself.
>One would be remiss to say that communication with subtle spirits is not harmful or even permissible because some are not bad, because it would be analogous to telling someone that playing with bears is okay because not all are wild and hungry.
Go on YouTube and watch some Russian dud play a with a bear. It's quite a wholesome experience.
Be humble, my friend. Come to know the light of Divine Wisdom. Your hatred of certain people and religious forms is but an illusion, not even borne from yourself. It is not man that is to be trusted, but God, for God is the source of man and is greater than man.
"He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered." Proverbs 28:26
I shall pray for you, for words will not convince you past your own pride. Peace and blessings be with you and yours, and may you find what you seek.
Stop projecting and don't give unsolicited advice with a split tongue.
You can't stop me from praying for you, brother. Be as wise as a serpent and innocent as a dove. My yoke is easy, my burden light.